|
Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 7:30:47 GMT
Against this, the Administration objects that the computer program worked correctly and that, if all its steps are not followed, the Administration cannot be informed of the defective applications, stating that in the present case there is an absolute lack of presentation of application . Likewise, it raises another objection: that the appellant could have submitted its application through the traditional system. The Administration cannot hide behind the way in which Fax Lists the corresponding computer program has been designed to avoid compliance with its duties towards individuals, nor to erode the guarantees of the administrative procedure. The Administration knew - or could have known - that the appellant had paid the fee . Furthermore, even accepting for purely argumentative purposes that it is not technically possible to automatically receive information on the steps taken by all those who have accessed the computer program, the Administration must, in any case, provide the possibility of correction when the interested party reacts to the problem. your non-inclusion on the list of those admitted and proves that you only omitted the final step (the electronic signature and registration of your application). The fact that there was an alternative to electronic means does not justify that the legal guarantees of the administrative procedure no longer apply.The good faith of the debtor: recklessness or negligence in the debt (VI/VI) In this case, it focuses on prudence when applying for credit.
|
|