Post by account_disabled on Mar 9, 2024 8:26:04 GMT
Personal Information Without Their Consent. This Applies Even to Data That is Public on the Internet. To Learn to Chat, Chatgpt Has Needed Hundreds of Billions of Words Obtained From the Internet. These Texts Can Include Mentions of People, and No One Has Removed Them or Asked for Their Consent. The Problem is That, in This Case, That Seems Impossible Given the Enormous Volume of Data: an “adobe Solution” is Not Viable. Therefore, a Strict Interpretation of European Regulations Seems Completely Incompatible With Systems Like Chatgpt.
Hence Italy Has Banned It . The Bad Seriously Harms the Competitiveness of a Country. For Example, These Types of Tools Multiply the Productivity of Programmers . If a Technology Company Wants to Hire Staff, Will It Do So in a UK Mobile Database Country Where They Are Allowed or Where They Are Prohibited? The Question Answers Itself. Thus, European Legislators Face an Uncomfortable Situation: Reconciling the Protection of Personal Data With Not Missing the Ai train Compared to Countries With More Lax Regulations, Such as the Anglo-saxon Ones. How Do We Use It? Another Key Aspect of Ai Regulation is What It is Used for.
We Must Remember That an Algorithm is Not Inherently Ethical or Unethical: It is a Tool That Someone Uses for a Purpose. For Example, Let's Imagine a System That Analyzes Patient Data and Suggests a Diagnosis . It Can Be Very Valuable to Help a Doctor, Making the Final Decision According to His Own Criteria. On the Other Hand, the Same Technology Would Be a Danger if It Makes the Final Decision, Replacing the Doctor. The Eu is Aware of This, and is Preparing a Regulation Under the Principle of “putting the Person at the Center”: Ai, Yes, but Always Under Human Supervision. The Problem is How to Carry It Out.
Hence Italy Has Banned It . The Bad Seriously Harms the Competitiveness of a Country. For Example, These Types of Tools Multiply the Productivity of Programmers . If a Technology Company Wants to Hire Staff, Will It Do So in a UK Mobile Database Country Where They Are Allowed or Where They Are Prohibited? The Question Answers Itself. Thus, European Legislators Face an Uncomfortable Situation: Reconciling the Protection of Personal Data With Not Missing the Ai train Compared to Countries With More Lax Regulations, Such as the Anglo-saxon Ones. How Do We Use It? Another Key Aspect of Ai Regulation is What It is Used for.
We Must Remember That an Algorithm is Not Inherently Ethical or Unethical: It is a Tool That Someone Uses for a Purpose. For Example, Let's Imagine a System That Analyzes Patient Data and Suggests a Diagnosis . It Can Be Very Valuable to Help a Doctor, Making the Final Decision According to His Own Criteria. On the Other Hand, the Same Technology Would Be a Danger if It Makes the Final Decision, Replacing the Doctor. The Eu is Aware of This, and is Preparing a Regulation Under the Principle of “putting the Person at the Center”: Ai, Yes, but Always Under Human Supervision. The Problem is How to Carry It Out.
